Spray drift issue – The Law

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: January 10, 2002

Q: We operate a small cattle operation in Surrey, B.C. A few years ago,

a neighbouring operation started growing cranberries. One day we

noticed the operators on the field wearing protective suits and masks.

We learned that they were applying a chemical spray, Parathion 60,

through their irrigation system. We also learned that the spray is not

recommended by the B.C. Cranberry Association. After the application we

could smell the spray and all family members had some discomfort. We

Read Also

One man holds a

Alberta honey business ‘thrives’ despite bumpy beginnings

Thrive Honey showcases its honey production in market where Alberta produces 40 per cent of all honey produced in the country

have spoken with our department of agriculture and various other

government agencies. We are concerned about our health and the

well-being of our herd. What can we do to ensure that this will never

happen again?

A: Pesticide use is controlled by federal and provincial legislation

and in some cases municipal bylaws. Under the federal Pest Control

Products Act, pesticides must be approved before they can be used in

Canada. More information can be obtained by contacting Health Canada’s

Pest Management Regulatory Agency

(www.hc-sc.gc.ca/pmra-arla/english/aboutpmra/

index-e.html).

For the most part, the application of pesticides is governed by

provincial laws, which vary. Generally, there are fewer regulatory

controls on the Prairies than British Columbia or Ontario. The common

law made by courts provides remedies for people who have suffered

damages as a result of negligent use of pesticides.

In some provinces municipalities have also legislated pesticide use.

While municipal powers vary depending on the provincial legislation

creating them, in a landmark ruling last year the Supreme Court of

Canada upheld the right of an urban Quebec municipality to ban

pesticides.

B.C.’s Pesticide Control Act and regulations set out the requirements

for use of pesticides. Whether a use permit or applicator certificate

is required depends upon the classification of the pesticide. The

regulations provide that no person shall “use a commercial pesticide

… containing a restricted-use provision … unless he is an

applicator.” Restricted pesticides can only be sold to people

possessing applicator certificates. Certain educational requirements

must be met to obtain a certificate.

The crop production guide available from the agriculture department

should be consulted to determine the require-ments for use of any

particular pesticide. Parathion is a restricted pesticide and I am told

it is being reviewed. Besides the Pesticide Control Act, there is

environmental and workers compensation legislation dealing with

pesticide use. Full details can be obtained by contacting the local

office of the Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection.

B.C. legislation can be viewed at www.gov.bc.ca.

Under common law, pesticide drift is grounds for a claim of nuisance.

Nuisance is interference with one’s ability to use and enjoy his land.

Any nuisance suit is subject to “right to farm legislation,” which

protects farmers using normal farming methods from such claims. You

mention the spray used is not recommended by the growers association.

If so, this may be grounds for arguing that use of this spray is not a

normal farm practice.

As an alternative to court, B.C. has established a Farm Practices

Board. The board mediates disputes and handles formal complaints to

determine whether “any odour, noise, dust or other disturbance” is a

normal farm practice. If a complaint can’t be resolved informally, it

will hold a hearing. If the board finds the complaint has merit, it can

order the farmer to cease the practice or modify the operation. The

Farm Practices Board can be reached at 250-356-8945 or at

www.agf.gov.bc.ca/ministry/fpb.htm.

Four formal complaints were filed in the 2000-01 fiscal year, though

the board dealt with many matters on an informal basis. There are

similar boards in some other provinces. In Saskatchewan you can’t sue

for nuisance unless you first complain to the Agricultural Operations

Review Board.

explore

Stories from our other publications