NAFTA fight over BSE rejected

By 
Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: November 13, 2003

HARTNEY, Man. – Canada’s cattle industry saw compelling grounds for a challenge under the North American Free Trade Agreement against the closure of the United States border to Canadian beef and cattle this year.

But the reasons for not pursuing that challenge were even more compelling, said Betty Green, president of the Manitoba Cattle Producers Association.

An industry sentiment was that a NAFTA challenge could easily tie the issue up before a trade tribunal for three to four years, Green said. It was possible that during that period of legal wrangling, the U.S. border would have stayed closed to Canadian beef and cattle imports, she said.

Read Also

A lineup of four combines wait their turn to unload their harvested crop into a waiting grain truck in Russia.

Russian wheat exports start to pick up the pace

Russia has had a slow start for its 2025-26 wheat export program, but the pace is starting to pick up and that is a bearish factor for prices.

Instead, the industry favoured another option, namely negotiating the reopening of the border based on scientific evaluations of the BSE risk in Canada and the degree of risk to countries importing Canadian cattle and beef.

And Green said there was another reason why a NAFTA challenge seemed less appealing: countries do not always fare well when they get into a trade scrap with the U.S.

“We decided that strong-arming a bully would not be a good idea,” Green said during a district meeting of the MCPA Nov. 6 in Hartney.

About the author

Ian Bell

Brandon bureau

explore

Stories from our other publications