Most farm debts under long-term rates

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: January 26, 1995

OTTAWA (Staff) – With an industry-wide debt stuck at more than $23 billion for the better part of a decade, farming is a very interest-rate sensitive sector.

Yet it is not as vulnerable to short-term interest rate increases as the overall size of the debt might suggest, say farm economists.

Much of that debt carries fixed interest rates over medium or long terms. Short-term fluctuations only have a bearing on long-term debt if mortgage renewal negotiations are taking place when rates are soaring.

University of Manitoba agricultural economist Daryl Kraft said a rule of thumb is that 20 percent of the debt is short-term or line-of-credit debt used as cash flow in operations. Twenty percent is five-year money for such uses as machinery purchases.

Read Also

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe takes questions from reporters in Saskatoon International Airport.

Government, industry seek canola tariff resolution

Governments and industry continue to discuss how best to deal with Chinese tariffs on Canadian agricultural products, particularly canola.

The remaining 60 percent is in the form of long-term mortgages.

It is the first 20 percent, or more than $4 billion, that is primarily affected by interest-rate fluctuations.

Agriculture Canada economist Garth Gorsky has a lower estimate of short-term debt vulnerable to interest rate increases. He said departmental estimates are that the average short-term farm debt was $13,800 last year or approximately $3.5 billion nationwide.

On average, it would be higher in livestock sectors. It is this debt that is vulnerable to interest rate fluctuations.

Recently, the Farm Credit Corporation rate on one-year money shot up almost a full percentage point to 105Ú8 percent.

If rates stay high, it will reverse a trend of falling debt servicing charges that has helped improve farm net income figures in recent years.

In 1991, the average debt servicing bill per farm was $8,300, according to Agriculture Canada.

By 1993, it had fallen to $6,500 and farmers recorded an improved bottom line despite falling market revenues per acre.

About the author

Barry Wilson

Barry Wilson is a former Ottawa correspondent for The Western Producer.

explore

Stories from our other publications