Feedlot owners denied access to traceback

By 
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: January 24, 2002

Confidentiality was promised more than a year ago to Canadian cattle

producers leery about a national identification program for their

livestock.

Producers were assured the program could not be used by feedlots to

trace cattle back to the herd of origin.

But some people think feedlots should be able to do that because

sometimes the cattle they buy have not been adequately immunized or

castrated before leaving the farm.

Tom Baron, a cattle producer and feedlot operator from Carberry, Man.,

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

is among those who support allowing feedlots and other cattle buyers to

trace cattle to their original herd.

“Why should people be scared to sell cattle unless it’s done

anonymously?” he asked, during the annual meeting of the Manitoba

Cattle Producers Association last week. “I really don’t understand the

mentality.”

Some feedlots have said producers should do a better job of vaccinating

their cattle against diseases such as bovine viral diarrhea.

However, Baron highlighted the problem of bull calves that are poorly

castrated at the farm level.

Sometimes one of the two testicles in the scrotum is left intact during

castration, resulting in what is called a belly nut. That belly nut

means the animal continues to behave like a bull, which can cause

problems when it is placed with other animals.

“The (feedlot) guys are … (angry) because they’re getting a bunch of

calves that are poorly castrated,” said Baron. “They’d sure like to

know who it was.”

But a motion to lobby the Canadian Cattle Identification Agency for the

kind of traceback sought by Baron was defeated during the MCPA meeting.

Some producers suggested producer confidence in the national ID program

would be shaken if the agency agreed to what Baron was seeking.

Bill Finney, a cattle producer and MCPA director from Eddystone, Man.,

said producers bought into the national ID program believing it would

help federal veterinarians trace diseases.

“To tell them you want to start making changes before the program is

implemented sends the wrong message.”

The program involves the identification of all cattle that move beyond

their herds of origin. The identification is done using ear tags

bearing numbers and a bar code unique to each animal.

As of July 1, there will be monetary penalties against producers who do

not comply with the program.

The system of traceback is expected to ensure the rapid containment and

elimination of potentially devastating reportable diseases and major

food safety defects.

About the author

Ian Bell

Brandon bureau

explore

Stories from our other publications