Your reading list

B.C. closes ag programs, offices

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: January 24, 2002

Last week’s deep government spending cuts, aimed at turning British

Columbia’s ailing economy around, hit the province’s agriculture and

fisheries ministry hard.

The department’s budget will be cut 45 percent over three years, down

to $44.5 million from $81 million. Only the forestry and transportation

department had deeper cuts.

Overall, the province’s budget will be cut $1.9 billion, about eight

percent over three years, announced Liberal premier Gordon Campbell,

who hopes to have a balanced budget within three years.

Read Also

Stacks of shipping containers sit dockside beneath the massive cranes that hoist them aboard ships in the Port of Vancouver with the mountainous North Shore visible in the background.

Message to provincial agriculture ministers: focus on international trade

International trade stakeholders said securing markets in the face of increasing protectionism should be the key priority for Canada’s agriculture ministers.

Agriculture minister John van Dongen put a bright face on his

ministry’s budget cuts during a media teleconference.

“I believe this is an appropriate budget and budget plan over the next

three years in the context of the overall fiscal situation,” he said.

“I think it strikes a good balance to help drive the economy but do it

in a frugal way with taxpayers’ dollars.”

Closing offices and eliminating programs, rather than cutting staff,

saved much of the money on the agriculture side. There are 381

agriculture positions within the department and there will be 55 fewer

after three years, a 17 percent cut. Overall, the province will

eliminate 11,700 jobs over three years, about one-third of provincial

civil servants.

Specific cuts to agriculture:

  • Discontinuation of participation in either the Net Income

Stabilization Account program or the Whole Farm Insurance Program, the

province’s part of the federal risk management program, by 2004-05.

The province puts $4 million annually into NISA, including the $460,000

interest incentive and $6.8 million into a trust fund for the Whole

Farm Insurance Program. It said it cannot afford to maintain both

programs.

“We’re indicating either NISA or the Whole Farm Insurance Program will

be eliminated,” said van Dongen.

  • Six agricultural offices will be closed by March 31, 2003 in

Courtney, Creston, Dawson Creek, Vanderhoof, Sidney and Smithers.

Instead of providing direct advisory services to farmers, the remaining

staff will focus on food safety, environmental sustainability and

resource development.

  • The Buy B.C. program designed to encourage consumers to buy local

products will be eliminated.

  • The Rural Development Office will be closed. The office was

established two years ago to help rural people and organizations deal

with intergovernmental bureaucracy.

  • The Grazing Enhancement Fund will be eliminated. The $2.5 million

annual fund was established in 1995 to help ranchers build fences and

water areas after the province doubled the amount of protected area on

the province’s crown land to 12 percent from six percent.

  • Elimination of the $200,000 B.C. Ag Council grant.
  • Elimination the $375,000 annual grant to provincial fairs and

exhibitions.

  • Elimination of the B.C. wine institute grant.
  • Elimination of the in-house desk publishing service.
  • Discontinuation of the Farm Business Advisory Service.
  • Elimination of the $25,000 grant to the B.C. Women’s Institute.
  • Elimination of the $800,000 premium support for crop insurance and

move to have the sales and marketing of crop insurance privatized by

2004-05.

  • The Okanagan tree replant program will be phased out early.
  • The Agriculture in the Classroom program will continue but the

province will no longer provide active support. The 4-H program will

remain.

  • Elimination of the $460,000 Net Income Stabilization Account interest

bonus grant.

Dave Borth, general manager of the B.C. Cattlemen’s Association, said

the agriculture ministry fared relatively well.

“We understand the fiscal situation the provincial government found

itself in and understand the need for some of the drastic measures they

took,” said Borth.

He is less clear how ranchers will be affected by cuts in forestry.

More than 95 percent of the province is crown land used jointly by

ranchers, forestry and wildlife. He expects there will be higher

grazing fees and an increased responsibility for land-use planning on

range users.

Ross Ravelli, with the British Columbia Grain Producers, said farmers

must do their share to help improve the province’s financial situation.

The closing of rural offices and a reduction of direct farm support

won’t affect most grain farmers in B.C.’s Peace River area. There were

so few staff to offer advice that most farmers sought agrology advice

from private companies, he said.

explore

Stories from our other publications