Your reading list

Air quality concerns grow as health declines

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: July 4, 2002

RED DEER – The complexity of chemicals and particulates suspended in

the atmosphere makes it nearly impossible to develop acceptable air

quality guidelines.

“People have been quite troubled by the notion that the science is

telling us there is simply no way that government can eliminate risk or

provide people with complete safety or a margin of safety,” said Ray

Copes, an occupational health physician with the British Columbia

health department.

He spoke at the recent clean air strategic

Read Also

Dairy cows on a Canadian farm eating at a feed bunk. Ventilation fans are shown over top of them.

U.S. farm group supports supply management

U.S. grassroots farm advocacy group pushing new agriculture legislation that would move towards supply management like Canada has for dairy industry

alliance conference held in Red Deer. The

alliance includes industry representatives from oil and gas, health,

agriculture and members of the public concerned about air quality.

Current standards and regulations for air quality are undergoing a

review to upgrade them based on new knowledge, said Copes.

International evidence indicates the effects of poor air quality are

long term and cumulative.

Air pollution gets less attention than poor water quality, yet as many

as 5,000 people die each year from air quality related illness, he

said. Many of those diseases might have been preventable.

Linked to disease

Some forms of cancer, heart disease and respiratory ailments have been

linked to common air pollutants. These adverse effects on health

occurred after people were exposed to relatively low concentrations.

Findings have been confirmed in many North American and European

communities.

Those at risk include children, pregnant women and people with

pre-existing conditions. Sheldon Roth, a physician and toxicologist at

the University of Calgary said other factors may include gender, race,

nutrition, socioeconomic factors, poor access to health care and place

of residence.

Air pollution is being evaluated as a more serious public health issue

so family physicians need to develop environmental risk histories of

their patients that include home air quality, community location,

hobbies, occupation, diet and drugs. The list of drugs should include

birth control pills, caffeine, nicotine, alcohol and herbal medicines

that can react when mixed with other substances.

It is rare for an individual to react from exposure to a single

compound and the pollution may be linked to other factors like smoking,

backyard burning, diesel emissions, chemical vapours or mould in the

home. The combination of pollutants makes it nearly impossible to link

a specific chemical to a health problem.

“The more investigation we do, the better we are able to zero in on

this fraction or that fraction,” Copes said.

Indoor air quality is a growing area of study, said Anthony Mak, chief

health inspector of the Capital Health Region based in Edmonton.

People spend most of their time indoors so they are subjected to a wide

array of substances in the air that may harm health.

Exposures to household consumer products, building materials,

furnishings, human activities, fungi, bacteria, mites and viruses often

make indoor air quality worse than outside air, said Mak.

For further information on the clean air strategic alliance visit,

www.casahome.org.

About the author

Barbara Duckworth

Barbara Duckworth

Barbara Duckworth has covered many livestock shows and conferences across the continent since 1988. Duckworth had graduated from Lethbridge College’s journalism program in 1974, later earning a degree in communications from the University of Calgary. Duckworth won many awards from the Canadian Farm Writers Association, American Agricultural Editors Association, the North American Agricultural Journalists and the International Agriculture Journalists Association.

explore

Stories from our other publications