Gov’t defends costs of ag consultations

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: May 16, 2002

It costs money to find out what farmers think, says a senior

Agriculture Canada official responding to complaints about the

department’s $15 million policy consultation budget.

“There’s two ways of approaching consultations,” said Yaprak

Baltacioglu, assistant deputy agriculture minister in charge of

strategic policy.

“One, we can do them very narrowly, we can just work with a very narrow

list of farm leaders. Or we can open up this debate so we can hear

everybody.”

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

She said the $15 million, two-year budget is allowing a broad

cross-section of the food industry to offer opinions on Canada’s new

agriculture strategy. As many as 1,000 people had taken part in the

consultation by early May.

“It’s hard to answer whether you can do consultations without spending

any money because engagement takes support,” said Baltacioglu.

“Right now, if we tell farmers ‘come to a meeting with your own money,

spend your whole day here and we won’t feed you, we won’t give you

lunch, nor will we pay your way’, I don’t think that we can engage a

lot of people.”

Liberal MPs on the House of Commons agriculture committee said they

expect a full accounting from the department on how the money is spent.

It was promised.

Ontario Liberal Paul Steckle said farmers may be feeling

“overconsulted” because of studies by House and Senate agriculture

committees, as well as the Liberal task force on agriculture and now

Agriculture Canada.

He said the total travel and consultation budget for all Commons

committees is less than $3 million. And farmers are angry at what they

see as too little income support from government.

“One has to wonder,” he told Agriculture Canada officials. “Given the

constraints, it just doesn’t sell very well out in rural Canada.”

Liberal Rose-Marie Ur said farmers in her riding aren’t happy and news

of a $15 million consultation budget has not helped.

Baltacioglu said there have been “a lot of misconceptions around that

number.” She said it includes consultation, communication “and other

outreach activities that may be required to build an agriculture policy

framework.”

She said agriculture is a big industry and it costs money to consult

all sectors.

“It’s large,” Ur agreed. “But they’re slowly dwindling because we

haven’t got a policy there to sustain them. We’re losing our farmers.”

explore

Stories from our other publications