WASHINGTON, D.C. (Reuters) — Mexico would seek “hundreds of millions” of dollars in trade retaliation against the United States if Washington does not change meat labelling laws, a Mexican official has said.
The World Trade Organization ruled last month that the U.S. had failed to bring its meat labelling regulations fully in line with international fair trading rules after a complaint by Mexico and Canada.
The ruling would be a step toward potential retaliation if packaging laws are not changed.
Canada estimates U.S. rules that require retailers to list the country-of-origin on meat cost its farmers and processors $1 billion a year in lost sales and lower prices. It has warned it would pursue all available remedies.
Read Also
Manitoba Parkland research station grapples with dry year
Drought conditions in northwestern Manitoba have forced researchers at the Parkland Crop Diversification Foundation to terminate some projects and reseed others.
Studies on the damage to Mexico had not yet been finalized but would run into the “hundreds of millions,” the Mexican official said Nov. 11. This could take total retaliation from Canada and Mexico to as much as $2 billion.
“Neither Mexico nor Canada will accept anything less than a full solution,” said the official, who is familiar with the WTO case and who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Acceptable options include scrapping the labelling law and replacing labels such as “Born in Mexico, Raised and Slaughtered in the United States” with a generic “North American” source, the official said.
The U.S. has said it may appeal the decision on country-of-origin labelling, and in that case a final WTO ruling is likely between next April and June.
Under WTO rules, retaliation is linked to the level of damage done by the offending actions, with the exact amount worked out in negotiation with the parties.
The Canadian Cattlemen’s Association said COOL forced Canadian and Mexican cattle to be segregated, adding costs along the supply chain.
“For the U.S. to come into compliance, it has to make a legislative change, and that legislative change has to be significant enough to eliminate the need to segregate,” said CCA counsel Edward Farrell.
John Murphy, U.S. Chamber of Commerce senior vice-president for international policy, said Congress should act soon to make sure the relevant sections of the law could be quickly rescinded once the WTO made its final ruling.
Advocates would be looking for opportunities to get such provisions before Congress this year or early next year, he said, noting there would be funding bills that must come up for a vote before the end of the year.
