Should livestock be fed our leftovers?

Whether it be from supermarkets, restaurants or household kitchens, people throw away a lot of food. Or rather, they feed it to animals.

In many countries such as Canada, close to 40 percent of total food loss comes from these later stages of the supply chain. While cycling food waste toward animal feed may seem like a noble approach to handling this challenge, the question remains: is food waste safe for animals?

Food waste materials are defined differently, depending on where they come from within the supply chain. The term “food loss” refers to waste generated during food processing and manufacturing (many of these items are safely diverted to animal feed in the form of byproducts). The term “food waste” refers to items discarded at retail or consumer levels. These carry a higher risk for harbouring contaminants and disease.

Feeding uncooked food waste to animals not only puts their health at risk, but also the entire food chain, especially if that food waste is contaminated with meat products.

In 2019, 25 to 35 percent of the global pork supply was wiped out from African swine fever — a highly transmissible viral disease that has been linked with feeding food waste to pigs.

In 2001, more than six million lambs, pigs and cattle died during the European foot-and-mouth disease epidemic, which was linked to the feeding of uncooked food waste to animals.

Other diseases like vesicular exanthema (a swine disease similar to foot-and-mouth), trichinosis (caused by parasitic roundworms in pigs), and BSE have also had devastating effects on livestock industries. All have been linked to improper feeding of food waste products.

Raw food waste can also harbour infectious organisms worrisome to public health, even if the food waste is plant-based. The risk of plant-based food waste being contaminated with salmonella, for example, may depend on the type of plants it came from. A study published in Frontiers of Microbiology found that certain vegetable plants tend to be colonized by salmonella more than others.

So, even if raw food waste is free of meat contaminants, that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s safe for animals.

Heavy metals and toxins are another risk factor to be considered before feeding food waste to livestock. A survey of European household and restaurant waste found that the levels of lead, cadmium and dioxins exceeded allowable limits for livestock feed.

These compounds accumulate in the food chain and can negatively impact human and animal health.

From animal feed to animal welfare to public health, all stages of the food supply chain are connected. That’s why many countries have implemented strict regulations around the use of food waste as animal feed.

And while the practice of feeding food waste to animals has decreased, it has not been eliminated. A survey from the United Kingdom estimated that 24 percent of small producers continue to feed uncooked household food waste to their livestock.

In Canada, feeding raw household or donated food waste to a producer’s own animals is allowed. It is the exception to the rules, as long as it isn’t contaminated with meat and the resulting animal products are not sold to anyone else.

These exceptions are confusing and send conflicting messages about the safety of the practice and raise concerns throughout the food industry.

Janna Moats is a professional agrologist and science writer from Saskatoon.

About the author

Janna Moats's recent articles


Stories from our other publications