Whether you are a tax expert or not, if you farm and personally own farmland or shares in a farming corporation, you are likely to have come across three words that sound like pure gold — capital gains exemption.
However, there are three other words that almost always tag along where the CGE goes — alternative minimum tax, or AMT. If you have previously used your CGE to shelter a significant gain and had never heard of the AMT, you were likely in for a big surprise when your taxes came due the following year.
This article is not going to review in detail when and how you can claim the CGE. However, in case you have not yet tripped across this phrase, or need a quick refresher, let’s go over the basics.
Different types of property give rise to different forms of taxable income when they are disposed of. Farmland and shares in a farming corporation (like many other things) are held by an individual as capital property. As such, when they are disposed of for an amount in excess of what they were purchased for, they give rise to a capital gain. At current tax and inclusion rates, capital gains are taxed at roughly 25 percent.
Each resident in Canada is entitled to claim the CGE on the disposition of certain capital assets. When disposing of qualifying farmland or shares in a family farming corporation, each individual has a CGE limit of $1 million.
What does that mean? Simply put, each individual can shelter capital gains of $1 million when disposing of these types of assets. Now, keep in mind that the farmland and shares must meet certain requirements to qualify. But going back to approximate tax rate of 25 percent, that is a tax savings of $250,000 — nothing to scoff at.
You are probably wondering, what is AMT, and what does it have to do with the CGE? Well, if CGE is the fun night out on the town, you can think of AMT as the hangover you didn’t see coming.
AMT is kind of what it sounds like, it is an alternative way to calculate tax that you owe to the government. It is basically the government’s way of making sure it still gets its pound of flesh from an individual who has availed themselves of significant preferential tax deductions in a year (such as the CGE).
In any given year, your taxes are calculated in the normal course and under the AMT regime. Typically, the taxes calculated in the normal course are higher than those calculated under the AMT regime, and that is what you pay. However, when the taxes calculated under the AMT regime are higher, that is what you pay.
The AMT calculation is dependent upon an individual’s other income in a year and how many preferential tax deductions (such as the CGE) they have taken. However, AMT can easily hit tens of thousands of dollars.
There is also some good news. You have seven years to recover AMT that you have paid. If you earn certain types of taxable income in the seven years following your payment of AMT, you can apply the AMT paid against the tax owing in future years. In this way, you can think of AMT as a prepayment of future years’ taxes.
For example, if you pay $50,000 in AMT for the 2020 tax year, and the following year you owed taxes of $27,000 on your employment income, you can apply the AMT paid in 2020 to cover your 2021 tax liability (you do not have to pay anything in 2021). So, following the 2021 tax year, you will have “soaked up” $27,000 of AMT, and will have $23,000 left to recover. To the extent you do not, or cannot, soak up the AMT you paid, it becomes a sunk cost.
Note that not all types of taxable income soak up AMT. Dividend income, for example, will not soak up AMT. This will often catch the unwary corporate owner who uses their CGE at the end of their career when they plan to retire and live off dividend income. If that is their only income stream available, they will have no way to use the AMT paid.
This is one of the main reasons (aside from reducing the shock value) why it is so important to be aware of AMT before you use your CGE. With proper planning in place, AMT paid can be nothing more than a pre-payment of future years’ tax.
Stephanie Maszko is a lawyer with Stevenson Hood Thornton Beaubier LLP in Saskatoon. For more information, contact: email@example.com. This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or other professional advice and does not replace independent legal or tax advice.