Your reading list

Rich countries’ subsidies called harmful to poor

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: November 21, 2002

The pernicious effects of rich-country agricultural subsidies on

poor-country farmers are evident throughout the world, speakers said at

a two-day conference sponsored by the Canadian Food Security Policy

Group.

The problem, they said, is that trade rules agreed to at the last World

Trade Organization negotiation in 1994 favoured the rich over the poor.

That deal allowed rich countries to keep their subsidies while forcing

poor countries to open their markets, said Geneva-based trade

consultant Luisa Bernal.

Read Also

University of California, Davis researcher Alison Van Eenennaam poses with cattle in a cattle pen in this 2017 photo.

Stacking Canada up on gene editing livestock

Canada may want to gauge how Argentina and other countries have approached gene editing in livestock and what that has meant for local innovation.

“Domestic support has increased rather than decreased (in

industrialized countries) since 1994,” she said. “The anticipated

benefits for developing countries have not materialized.”

Speakers at the conference, which featured development advocates,

Canadian government ministers and developing country representatives,

offered examples of the impact of subsidies and trade in subsidized

food products:

  • Mark Fried of Oxfam Canada said the United States’ $3.9 billion in

annual subsidies to the domestic cotton industry is greater than the

value of the crop and allow U.S. product to swamp foreign markets.

  • Rice from the U.S., given as food aid and targeted to countries that

could some day be commercial markets, has put farmers in Jamaica and

Guyana out of business.

  • In Zambia, according to national university agriculture dean Obed

Lungu, help from Canadian researchers in the 1980s created wheat

varieties that could grow in the country and when small farmers adopted

the crop, production rose to 70 percent of national needs. Then cheap

European Union and South African wheat came in, prices dropped and

wheat production fell.

“We’re back where we were,” he said. “We’re at less than 50 percent and

it is all the large commercial farmers. The impact of that development

has been wiped out.”

  • Ali Lamont from the Canadian Wheat Board said American misuse of food

aid or concessional export credit arrangements regularly undermine

board sales.

“Subsidized products from developed counties are creating huge

problems,” said Rieky Stuart of Oxfam Canada. She said 50,000 rice

farmers in Haiti have been put off the land by competition from cheap

subsidized American rice.

“It’s not a theoretical problem,” she said.

It is why chief Canadian WTO agriculture negotiator Suzanne Vinet told

the meeting that reducing high rich-country domestic farm subsidies is

a Canadian priority at the current round of World Trade Organization

talks.

“We need real and meaningful reductions in production and trade

distorting subsidies so farmers everywhere can benefit from a more

level trade playing field,” added agriculture minister Lyle Vanclief.

About the author

Barry Wilson

Barry Wilson is a former Ottawa correspondent for The Western Producer.

explore

Stories from our other publications