Manitoba government denies spy tactics

By 
Ian Bell
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: November 7, 2002

The Manitoba government was accused recently of using spy tactics to

hunt for farms that might be polluting the environment.

It’s an allegation that the province says arose out of a

misunderstanding, and a conservation department official said they have

not started a “covert operation” using airplanes to monitor activities

on farms.

The issue arose following an Oct. 17 meeting between provincial farm

groups and Manitoba conservation officials. During the meeting, it was

mentioned that the province had used planes this fall to gather some

Read Also

An aerial view of flooding in Manitoba in 2022 that shows a rural grid road just barely above the surface of water on both sides of it.

Rural Manitoba resources slim on natural disaster planning

A study from Brandon University’s Rural Development Institute has found that many rural and small municipalities don’t have the staff or resources to make formal climate plans against natural disaster.

information about livestock farms.

The mention of airplanes was delivered in a “we are watching you” kind

of tone, said Scott Hunt, a cattle producer from Hartney, Man., and a

director for the Manitoba Cattle Producers Association. He got the

impression from the meeting that officials were compiling lists to

identify farms warranting further investigation of their manure

management.

“We found that to be quite offensive,” Hunt said. “They’re using it as

a pressure tool.”

Hunt said his association wants to know what information was gathered

by the department during the airplane flights. He said the MCPA will

use Access to Information legislation, which defines what information

government must make public, if that’s what it takes to unearth the

truth.

Sylvio Tessier of Manitoba Conservation said his department did send

staff out in planes in late September and early October to test the

merits of using aircraft to find previously unknown livestock

operations.

Conservation employees took note of those operations, said Tessier,

with the intention of returning later with a ground visit to make sure

the producers were aware of the province’s manure management

regulations.

The flights were also used to get a general sense of what types of

livestock operations are located in the different regions of the

province, he said.

The value of the information gained from those flights will be reviewed

this winter, but Tessier said the association between airplanes and a

covert surveillance of farms is ludicrous.

“We’re not running a covert operation. We don’t even have an operation

like they’re talking about. You can’t see a whole lot about what goes

on with manure application from the air.”

Claire De’Athe, also an MCPA director, said the actions of the

department smack of the tactics used by dictatorships.

“It isn’t democratic and it isn’t Canadian,” said De’Athe, a cattle

producer from Carberry, Man. “If they have a concern about my

operation, they could come to my door.”

The MCPA directors said cattle producers are an easy target for

airplane surveillance because their livestock and pens can easily be

viewed from the sky. However, De’Athe suggested the department’s

actions should be a concern to all producers.

“Because we are an open and visible commodity, initially we will feel

the heat, but I don’t think we’re the only people in the picture here.”

The MCPA directors raised the issue at a general council meeting of

Keystone Agricultural Producers in Brandon recently and won support to

protest the use of surveillance planes.

About the author

Ian Bell

Brandon bureau

explore

Stories from our other publications