VIDEO: GM sugar beets revolutionize industry

Growers say the glyphosate-tolerant varieties have eased crop management and reduced crop’s environmental impact

Alberta sugar beet growers embraced glyphosate-tolerant varieties when they first became available about 10 years ago.

They’ve never looked back.

The technology has revolutionized crop management and growers say it has also reduced the environmental impact of producing the labour-intensive crop.

“It’s nine years since we’ve been growing glyphosate-tolerant sugar beets,” said Alberta Sugar Beet Growers vice-president Gary Vucurevich, during an Oct. 23 tour of his beet field.

“It’s a huge benefit for us as farmers, not only in terms of weed control but it’s also eliminated a lot of the work associated with sugar beets.”

In Alberta’s early history with the crop, sugar beet fields were often weeded by hand using crews brought in for the purpose. In latter years, herbicides became widely available but they had limitations.

“As chemical weed control came on, we were able to eliminate the hand labour, but the chemicals that were used to spray the sugar beets were actually quite harmful to the crop. They set the crop back and they actually didn’t do a really good job of controlling the weeds,” said Vucurevich.

“It would involve between four and six passes with different mixes of herbicides to control the weeds and we would get reasonable weed control but it was not great.”

Growers would follow up with inter-row tillage, often requiring two or three passes through the field during the growing season.

When genetically modified Roundup Ready beet varieties were approved for use, growers went all-in. Virtually all sugar beets grown in southern Alberta are glyphosate tolerant.

“It has really reduced the impact on fuel use, labour, all those kinds of things,” Vucurevich said. “We can spray the sugar beets now with a broadcast sprayer. We can typically get away with between two and four applications of Roundup. Our weed control is typically excellent. It has been a game changer for Alberta farmers as well as virtually every other sugar beet farmer in North America.”

Less chemical is used per acre, and glyphosate itself is less harmful than herbicides that used to be used, he added. There are also fuel and water savings.

“We’re burning less fuel, using less energy to produce the crop. So we’re way more efficient that way,” said Vucurevich.

“It also allows us to use somewhat less water. We can make more timely irrigation applications because we’re not trying to co-ordinate them so much with the weed control efforts that we’re making.”

The technology hasn’t been without controversy, as with other genetically modified crops. After Roundup Ready sugar beets were deregulated in the United States, where they were first introduced, a 2009 lawsuit led to further environmental assessment. That subjected American growers to certain restrictions, which were eventually lifted in 2012.

A 2018 study at the University of Idaho said sugar beets were “arguably one of the most suitable crops for GR (glyphosate resistant) technology” because other herbicides aren’t as effective, beets require a long crop rotation, their gene flow is negligible because they are biennial and harvested before flowering and because processing degrades beet DNA.

“Studies have shown that processed GR beet sugar is identical to non-GR beet sugar, as well as cane sugar,” the study’s abstract said.

Southern Alberta’s sugar beet harvest is underway after early October delays due to snowfall.

ASBG president Arnie Bergen-Henengouwen said the crop is not quite as good as last year but to date is yielding about 30 tonnes per acre with sugar content near 19.25 percent.

About the author

Comments

  • RobertWager

    Wonderful advances in sustainable agriculture from this technology.

    • richard

      two to four applications of glyphosate per season is a one way street to resistance…. nothing sustainable there, sorry.

      • Eric Bjerregaard

        2 to 4? Nope and you are assuming no rotation with other chemicals.

        • richard

          …..”We can typically get away with between two to four applications of Roundup”…..No, I am just assuming no common sense, but of course greed always trumps common sense…..

          • Eric Bjerregaard

            No, it doesn’t “always” sometimes farmers and others are smart enough to rotate treatments and the article mentions long rotations. Thus unless the alternate crops use Glyphosate ready technology. The risk goes down. Sorry, I spaced out the 2 to 4 comment. I am checking with a beet grower to see if that is accurate.

          • richard

            Yeah sometimes farmers are smart enough….. sometimes they’re not…. And the ones who are not are spreading herbicide resistant weed seeds all over the country for the rest of us to deal with. Can you spell wilful ignorance?…..So much for the sugar beet revolution… and the “beet” goes on….

          • Rotate “treatments”. You mean use different toxic chemicals?

      • Ken Reilly

        did you miss the part about the 4-6 passes of the old herbicides and it not being very effective? that is the expressway to resistance

  • Goldfinger

    Farmers who are seeing that GMO beets are discounted in the marketplace are not likely as happy with GMO sugar beets as the biotech chemical industry is.

  • Chris Preston

    “We’re burning less fuel, using less energy to produce the crop. So we’re way more efficient that way,” said Vucurevich.

    “It also allows us to use somewhat less water. We can make more timely irrigation applications because we’re not trying to co-ordinate them so much with the weed control efforts that we’re making.”

    This is why we have to use the best technologies in farming. It allows the footprint of farming to be reduced and there are more resources available for other species on the planet.

explore

Stories from our other publications