Opinion: Dairy progress off table if NAFTA fails

To the U.S. dairy industry:

Your industry has a window of opportunity for improving access to the Canadian dairy market. However, that window will close if the North American Free Trade Agreement talks fail.

Your chances for improved access will be even worse if the United States withdraws from NAFTA.

U.S. negotiators have made poison-pill demands that neither Canada nor Mexico can possibly accept. These include: a clause that would automatically terminate NAFTA after five years unless all three parties agree to renewal; evisceration of the NAFTA dispute settlement mechanisms including state-to-state dispute settlement that is essential to any well-functioning trade agreement; punitive automotive rules of origin that include a 50 percent U.S.-specific content requirement that violates World Trade Organization requirements; and government procurement rules that would severely reduce the combined access of Canada and Mexico to U.S. procurement markets.

Related Stories:

Congress must approve any agreement that is reached. Kevin Brady, chair of the House of Representatives ways and means committee, opposes weakening dispute settlement procedures.

The U.S. auto industry is vehemently opposed to the proposed auto rules of origin.

The U.S. business community has strongly rejected the proposals on government procurement.

Never mind Canadian and Mexican opposition, these proposals would never be approved by the U.S. Congress.

The opening U.S. proposal on dairy calls for phasing out Canada’s dairy supply management system over a period of 10 years.

Canada’s dairy industry naturally describes this as another poison pill. But unlike the real poison pills, the U.S. position on dairy is not trade-restrictive and can best be described as an aggressive opening position. While Canadian politicians defend Canada’s restrictive supply management system, in fact Canada agreed to some easing of dairy import quotas in a number of recent trade negotiations, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

Supply management benefits Canada’s diminishing numbers of dairy farmers, but results in high prices for processors and consumers, at a net cost to our country. Many Canadians want this system replaced and would approve loosening restrictions on U.S. milk products.

Also, rulings by the WTO appellate body preclude the Canadian industry from charging export prices any lower than the high domestic prices. This has effectively shut it out of foreign markets.

The Canadian dairy industry has legitimate concerns about significantly opening the market to U.S. imports. Your industry, which operates on a much larger scale, benefits from subsidies, as well as from lower costs through extensive use of immigrant labour.

U.S. dairy imports could wipe out the Canadian industry unless that structural advantage is addressed.

Also, any transition period should permit Canadian exporters to charge competitive prices in the U.S., notwithstanding the WTO ruling.

All in all, your industry would benefit from greater access to the Canadian market, and this is an achievable outcome of the current NAFTA renegotiations — if, that is, U.S. negotiators remove their poison pills. I recommend that you take whatever steps you can to have them removed so that the NAFTA talks have a chance of success.

Jon Johnson is a former adviser to the Canadian government during North American Free Trade Agreement negotiations and is a senior fellow at the C.D. Howe Institute.

About the author

Jon Johnson's recent articles


  • bufford54

    It is my belief that working Canadians were better off before the invention of a government regulated NAFTA agreement. Whatever happened to the capitalist system of free enterprise? Just because the government says “this will be good for you”, doesn’t make it so.

    • Harold

      I don’t know of any politician who can fully understand a complicated Trade deal. The Politicians would only be the puppets of those who do understand and that should concern all of us. Trade deals should be constructed and negotiated by Canadian owned industries of Canada and their legal teams but since the signing of NAFTA mostly all of the Canadian owned industries have vanished and were replaced by foreign ownership. I saw our businesses leave Canada and judging by the photo of yourself, so did you. Money has the ability to secretly remove from us our sovereignty without our knowledge. For example, with US owned Cargill and Cargill Canada a satellite of that U.S. Corporation, what leverage does our government have against the USA? Multiply that by all of the foreign ownership in Canada and you can see why our government are only USA and international puppets in these current trade talks. The TPP was not signed because of our strength; it was signed because of our weakness and lack of leverage. The same thing happened to the United States and Mexico because of the NAFTA agreement, to a lesser degree, but Trump is turning that around. Canada says the NAFTA deal is good deal only because they can say no other thanks to the bungling politicians who signed the original agreement. If Media were to take from the archives what was said and promised at the time of NAFTA’s signing, Canadians would know the Failure that NAFTA has been.

  • Monkeeworks

    Wow, I really didn’t know we never traded with the U.S. or Mexico before NAFTA! If the government says, “we are here to help”, be very afraid. As an example: $10,000,000 (after over runs and a one month rink extention) to build and operate an outside rink for less than 3 months. Within that 3 months it melted and had to be iced again. Then it was to cold to skate. Canadian winters, what a surprise. That is OUR money the government is wasting, your money and mine, from every tax payer in Canada! That money didn’t belong to the government it belonged to you and me. How did you benefit? Just how does it benefit anyone living outside Ottawa? Good Lordy! Any other town or village in Canada could have built a permanent really nice indoor arena with a 12 month a year rink and curling ice too. Temporary means all dollars spent are lost in the end. $10,000,000 dollars down the toilet. And our government thinks they can negotiate a trade deal. Right.


Stories from our other publications