Pain is as plain as the look on its face

Many pet owners believe they know how their dog or cat is feeling.

They may be right. Research into facial expressions of emotion and pain could help producers and veterinarians better understand when an animal is feeling discomfort.

People who spend a lot of time around animals may already have an ability to read emotions but now there is scientific evidence and possibly a computer application to understand variations in facial expressions, said Mirjam Guesgan.

She has researched facial expressions in sheep and lambs when she completed her doctorate at Massey University in New Zealand.

“By doing this kind of research, we are bringing those sorts of things to people’s attention. Once they are aware of it and you can train people to look for these different expressions then they can do it themselves,” she said.

She recently completed a post-doctoral fellowship at the University of Alberta.

Mammals display a spectrum of emotions and when people have more empathy for them they can offer better treatments or protect themselves when working around large or dangerous animals.

“If you are not reading the horse’s body language or face correctly, you can get injured,” she said in an interview.

To prepare a computer model, good base line data is necessary to determine meaning in facial expressions.

“It involves decoding the facial features and showing how they change when an animal shows a particular kind of emotion.”

Despite their different anatomy, mice, rats, rabbits, horses and sheep all display similar faces to indicate pain, which can be transferred to a pain coding indicator called a grimace scale. When in pain, many animals squint their eyes, hold their ears back and tighten their mouths. They may puff out or suck in their cheeks.

“You need to identify those features first and then you can program them into some sort of computer algorithm,” Guesgan said.

That algorithm compares the image of the animal when it is has a neutral expression to the face that indicates pain.

Most of her work has been done with sheep. They often hide their pain but during the course of the research their facial expressions did change. This may be a way to communicate with one another.

“You might want to let others in your group know, ‘hey I am in pain, help me out or go away,’ ” she said.

Research was done on the lambs after their tails were docked. They were not subjected to any extra circumstances to elicit a response.

Happiness or contentment is less researched, although people often have a good sense of how an animal such as the family dog is feeling.

“When it comes to animal welfare research on the positive side, there hasn’t been that much work done. It is an emerging field.”

Studying positive emotions in dogs may be a good start.

“They co-evolved with us. They have evolved over about 100,000 years together so the cues that we are sending back and forth especially could be real,” she said.

Studying facial features is easier than interventions like monitoring heart rates or blood tests looking for stress hormones.

At the same time, people can’t jump to conclusions.

“We have to be a bit careful be-cause it is very tempting to want to put a particular emotion on an animal based on facial features.”

“We may think an animal is experiencing something but we need scientific evidence to really tell those facial expression or heart rate or changes in brain activity. Any of those can give use clues as to how an animal is feeling,” she said.

About the author


  • old grouchy

    OH boy – – – !!
    I was in an informational meeting and the presenter asked an individual at one of the tables what another person was thinking and feeling. That individual didn’t want to answer the question. Another person was asked and a third. Only one response was given and it was an attempt to make the non-responses funny. The point was that without communication ability there is NO way to determine thoughts nor any way to ascertain feelings of another person.
    Now when it comes to animals there are further impediments! They have no accurate way to communicate to us humans – – — contrary to the verbiage above!! It is possible to determine using very non-simple tools effect of process (possibly by measuring adrenaline levels of course this would vary by effect needing to be measured) but the is NO WAY to determine what the animal is ‘feeling’.
    Now of course if one wants to promote the use of analgesics and of anesthetics (so much for non-chemical non-drug use!!) well then any time an animal is handled or sorted let’s just shot ’em up with an analgesic or anesthetic so they will ‘feel’ better.

    But – – – but – – – this will create further complications – – – – no – – – the animals will ‘feel’ better – – – see how their faces no longer register pain.

    Wow – – – if this anthropomorphization continues maybe we should look into training animal lawyers and politicians! (This was done in that seminal allegory ‘Animal Farm’ – – – maybe that should be a required read in vet school!)

    Good luck finding a direct link between animal facial expression heart rate or brain activity and animal experience. In humans we call it communication – — but that we humans don’t really do worth a huge hill of excrement!


Stories from our other publications