Horejsi is a behavioural scientist based in Calgary, Gilbert is a wildlife ecologist from Wolfe Island, Ont., and Wuerthner is an ecologist from Richmond, Vermont.
People are barking up the wrong tree by promoting or succumbing to wind turbine construction regardless of where it is proposed and how many there might be.
Many North Americans are infected with tunnel vision and erroneously appear to believe that turbine generated energy is somehow linked to reversing the growth in and impact of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. There exists no evidence anywhere that turbine energy is substituting for or displacing fossil fuel dependence, nor is there any evidence that it is in any material way slowing the rate of GHG emission growth.
Turbine energy is a non factor in the never-ending growth agenda of the fossil fuel industry, and it is not a factor in the agenda of governments promoting growth in and dependence on oil and gas consumption. There can be no better example than North America of the failure of turbine energy to slow growth in anything.
People have been hoodwinked into promoting wind turbine energy as some sort of nirvana while human population growth and per capita energy consumption continue to spiral upward. Turbine energy generation is fueling growth in human population and energy consumption and growth in a false economy.
Matching the folly of the energy replacement misunderstanding is denial by governments and promoters of the ecological impacts and health effects of turbines. The ugly reality is that they are a serious addition to the industrialization of quiet rural landscapes that people have long valued for quality of life, retirement and recreation.
The list of environmental costs imposed on wildlife and people are now being recognized. They are far from meaningless, but they have been trivialized by turbine promoters and politicians that have systematically tilted the deck sharply in the developers’ favor.
Environmental costs have been systematically ignored by a political and regulatory system that has corrupted individual and societal freedom and environmental integrity by relegating these values to some distant offshoot of economic growth.
These costs, and those who stand by them, are treated with contempt; how dare they influence the decision to grant some landowner a chance to make a buck by carving your backyard and your space into fragments with giant chopping machines?
Wind turbines are an assault on human well being and act to degrade the human gestalt. Promotion of wind turbine energy is a case of serious misjudgment by those who use green wash to promote their commercial aspirations.
Buried deep within the human genome is an innate recognition and suspicion of monsters – large objects – looming on the horizon. Wind turbines are today’s versions of a threatening monster, jammed down the throats of neighbours and localities.
We do not subscribe to the managerial-market approach to democracy or conservation with its deeply entrenched bias against human values such as an unadulterated horizon. This largely corporate view denigrates the value of freedom of the human spirit, the very pedestal upon which human dignity, character and strength are built.
In an honest and fair regulatory and political environment, local citizens and communities would bury turbine projects long before they get to the serious implementation stage. Once again, however, citizens are being forced to try and employ the very tools that degrade our quality of life and humiliate us as mere pawns of some corporate created market economy.
That being the case, it occurs to us that wind turbines wear eternally on the human psyche, constituting a taking by corporate promoters and biased government collaborators; a taking that damages the well being of all residents.
We asked ourselves if a $1,000 payment per person would compensate for the damages imposed on the everyday life of hundreds and thousands of affected citizens. Not even close.
Perhaps then, $3,000, or $8,000? Would that kind of money make up for the forced collapse of part of your quality of life, your loss of right to space, loss of privacy, loss of political power, curbs on your freedom and the mental and physical costs imposed on you by stress associated with constant angst, irritation and distraction?
For some, we suspect yes would be the answer. For others, like those who have lost a child to negligent corporate behavior, been strangled slowly by nicotine or been poisoned by toxic emissions or effluent, no amount of money can compensate for the deprivation and harm they have and will suffer.
The commercial private sector is forcing itself into your life, and that constitutes a taking of your rights, benefits and well being. We propose that each person impacted by a turbine receive, as a starting point for negotiations, $3,000 annually, to be paid by the developer and offending land owner for the loss of private and citizen rights, a very large portion of which includes peace and satisfaction, a critical part of your state of mind.
We all know that is a significant part of personal, social and democratic well being. The concept is simple: if the developer and some uncaring land owners want to destroy your rights and those of other citizens, inflicting on you suffering and mental distress, the good old free enterprise system developers and local governments love to hide behind, comes into play. They pay to destroy part of your life.
The recent proliferation of wind turbine farms is just one more case of the serious aggression and destruction that reflects the continuing expansion of an extremist private property and commercialism agenda. This socially, legally and politically defective agenda and process is being exploited by corporations, some local residents, and local governments.
This is not freedom and it is not democracy. It is vandalism and oppression in the name of commercialism. As citizens we have the right, and we say the obligation, and we must marshal the courage, to reject wind turbine invasions as a corruption of our well being that is cached in our spirit rather than in our wallet.