<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Western Producer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.producer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.producer.com</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s best source for agricultural news and information.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Organic food not safer than conventional by Welderone</title>
		<link>http://www.producer.com/2012/01/organic-food-not-safer-than-conventional/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Welderone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producer.com/?p=83805#comment-957</guid>
		<description>Bill, you do not need a non organic lobbing group to show all the facts are correct in my letter. Just go to Safeways yourself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, you do not need a non organic lobbing group to show all the facts are correct in my letter. Just go to Safeways yourself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Organic food not safer than conventional by Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.producer.com/2012/01/organic-food-not-safer-than-conventional/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 03:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producer.com/?p=83805#comment-954</guid>
		<description>I would like to see a report from a NON-organic lobbying group or source that supports your claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see a report from a NON-organic lobbying group or source that supports your claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Organic food not safer than conventional by Welderone</title>
		<link>http://www.producer.com/2012/01/organic-food-not-safer-than-conventional/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Welderone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producer.com/?p=83805#comment-953</guid>
		<description>There is no doubt organic food is a more healthy choice. But I just today bought organic bread at Safeways. The organic bread was $4.39 for 680 grams and 100% whole wheat nonorganic was $2.99 for 570 grams. But when one adjusts for the extra 120 grams with the organic bread. A loaf of organic bread then would be about $3.80. So a difference of about 80 cents. This is long ways from being a difference of $3.50. Both breads were another 50 cents off about with a club membership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt organic food is a more healthy choice. But I just today bought organic bread at Safeways. The organic bread was $4.39 for 680 grams and 100% whole wheat nonorganic was $2.99 for 570 grams. But when one adjusts for the extra 120 grams with the organic bread. A loaf of organic bread then would be about $3.80. So a difference of about 80 cents. This is long ways from being a difference of $3.50. Both breads were another 50 cents off about with a club membership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Organic food not safer than conventional by Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.producer.com/2012/01/organic-food-not-safer-than-conventional/#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 02:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producer.com/?p=83805#comment-948</guid>
		<description>Yeah sure Dayton, the richest 15% of the developed world buys organic because it makes them feel better and they can afford to pay that extra $3.50 for a loaf of bread. What about the other 85%? Where the heck do you think I live? I farm here for gods sakes! You think that Organic companies don&#039;t bring in produce from other countries like Mexico? I can almost guarantee that they do! Where do you get organic tomatoes from in the middle of January? I love how all of you people who are against GMO&#039;s think everyone who sees their benefit works for Monsanto. Its really funny by the way. Maybe they just realize the benefits that can be achieved with growing these crops, higher yields, higher profits, being able to feed more people! Our population could never be sustained under organic production, conventional farming is why so many more people are alive today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah sure Dayton, the richest 15% of the developed world buys organic because it makes them feel better and they can afford to pay that extra $3.50 for a loaf of bread. What about the other 85%? Where the heck do you think I live? I farm here for gods sakes! You think that Organic companies don&#8217;t bring in produce from other countries like Mexico? I can almost guarantee that they do! Where do you get organic tomatoes from in the middle of January? I love how all of you people who are against GMO&#8217;s think everyone who sees their benefit works for Monsanto. Its really funny by the way. Maybe they just realize the benefits that can be achieved with growing these crops, higher yields, higher profits, being able to feed more people! Our population could never be sustained under organic production, conventional farming is why so many more people are alive today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Support wise use of chemicals rather than imposing bans by Pragmatic in Manitoba</title>
		<link>http://www.producer.com/2012/02/support-wise-use-of-chemicals-rather-than-imposing-bans/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator>Pragmatic in Manitoba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producer.com/?p=85747#comment-939</guid>
		<description>Health Canada clearly says that effective pest management for lawns doesn&#039;t have to involve pesticide use. The regulator asks us to remember that pesticides give short-term control of lawn pests, but rarely long-lasting solutions (excerpt from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/pest/part/protect-proteger/use-utiliser/_lawn-pelouse/index-eng.php).  

The responsible and wise behavior is to avoid using or buying pesticides for cosmetic reasons. By following simple and well documented maintenance practices, it is easy, and cheap, to get a lawn that is green and healthy for kids and pets to play on.  

The essence of the regulations in other provinces is simple: limit human --and most importantly children&#039;s-- exposure to these toxic chemicals.  

In Manitoba, a legislation to ban the use and sale of pesticides for cosmetic reasons is not only a necessity, it is overdue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Health Canada clearly says that effective pest management for lawns doesn&#8217;t have to involve pesticide use. The regulator asks us to remember that pesticides give short-term control of lawn pests, but rarely long-lasting solutions (excerpt from <a href="http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/pest/part/protect-proteger/use-utiliser/_lawn-pelouse/index-eng.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/pest/part/protect-proteger/use-utiliser/_lawn-pelouse/index-eng.php</a>).  </p>
<p>The responsible and wise behavior is to avoid using or buying pesticides for cosmetic reasons. By following simple and well documented maintenance practices, it is easy, and cheap, to get a lawn that is green and healthy for kids and pets to play on.  </p>
<p>The essence of the regulations in other provinces is simple: limit human &#8211;and most importantly children&#8217;s&#8211; exposure to these toxic chemicals.  </p>
<p>In Manitoba, a legislation to ban the use and sale of pesticides for cosmetic reasons is not only a necessity, it is overdue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roundup Ready alfalfa assessed  by Dayton</title>
		<link>http://www.producer.com/2012/02/roundup-ready-alfalfa-assessed%e2%80%a9/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>Dayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producer.com/?p=85812#comment-932</guid>
		<description>Resistant Kochia and Alfalfa what a combination for the forage industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resistant Kochia and Alfalfa what a combination for the forage industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When bans become banes  by Pragmatic in Manitoba</title>
		<link>http://www.producer.com/2012/02/when-bans-become-banes%e2%80%a9/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Pragmatic in Manitoba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producer.com/?p=85514#comment-930</guid>
		<description>While KAP position is surprising and disappointing, it is in line with other more powerful lobby groups representing the financial interests of the pesticide industry.  

No matter how thorough Health Canada is in regulating pesticides, they still recommend to minimize their use.  

Health Canada also says that effective pest management for lawn care doesn’t have to involve pesticide use. Furthermore, the regulator asks us to remember that pesticides give short-term control of lawn pests, but rarely long-lasting solutions (edited excerpt from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/pest/part/protect-proteger/use-utiliser/_lawn-pelouse/index-eng.php).  

Personally, like the vast majority of Canadians, I do not use nor buy pesticides for cosmetic reasons. By following simple and well documented maintenance practices, I get a lawn that is green and healthy for kids and pets to play on.  

The essence of the new proposed regulation is to limit human –and most importantly children’s– exposure to these toxic chemicals.  

In Manitoba, a legislation to ban the use and sale of pesticides for cosmetic and non-essential reasons is not only a necessity, it is overdue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While KAP position is surprising and disappointing, it is in line with other more powerful lobby groups representing the financial interests of the pesticide industry.  </p>
<p>No matter how thorough Health Canada is in regulating pesticides, they still recommend to minimize their use.  </p>
<p>Health Canada also says that effective pest management for lawn care doesn’t have to involve pesticide use. Furthermore, the regulator asks us to remember that pesticides give short-term control of lawn pests, but rarely long-lasting solutions (edited excerpt from <a href="http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/pest/part/protect-proteger/use-utiliser/_lawn-pelouse/index-eng.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/pest/part/protect-proteger/use-utiliser/_lawn-pelouse/index-eng.php</a>).  </p>
<p>Personally, like the vast majority of Canadians, I do not use nor buy pesticides for cosmetic reasons. By following simple and well documented maintenance practices, I get a lawn that is green and healthy for kids and pets to play on.  </p>
<p>The essence of the new proposed regulation is to limit human –and most importantly children’s– exposure to these toxic chemicals.  </p>
<p>In Manitoba, a legislation to ban the use and sale of pesticides for cosmetic and non-essential reasons is not only a necessity, it is overdue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Farm accident has happy ending for young children  by Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.producer.com/2012/02/farm-accident-has-happy-ending-for-young-children%e2%80%a9/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producer.com/?p=85811#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Kids will be kids, what a scary experience that must have been.  My question is this, why are accidents that happen in a rural setting almost always added to the category of &quot;Farm Accidents&quot; 
It gives farming a bad name in the occupational safety statistics and many of these accidents have nothing to with the actual occupation/business of Farming.
Just a point I wanted to make.
Hopefully these boys learned their lesson.
Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kids will be kids, what a scary experience that must have been.  My question is this, why are accidents that happen in a rural setting almost always added to the category of &#8220;Farm Accidents&#8221;<br />
It gives farming a bad name in the occupational safety statistics and many of these accidents have nothing to with the actual occupation/business of Farming.<br />
Just a point I wanted to make.<br />
Hopefully these boys learned their lesson.<br />
Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pesticide ban position questioned  by Anti Canadian Cancer Society</title>
		<link>http://www.producer.com/2012/02/pesticide-ban-position-questioned%e2%80%a9/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti Canadian Cancer Society</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producer.com/?p=85810#comment-928</guid>
		<description>90 Million Dollars and they [Cancer Society] can&#039;t even come up with a valid Scientific Paper that could be peer review by other Scientists and The Pest Management Regulatory Agency?

Show us the Growing Body of Evidence that lawn pesticides cause cancer.  There is none.

Show us evidence of provinces that have pesticide bans in place are now healthier than provinces that still use lawn pesticides.  There is none.


If you get Cancer you will notice very quickly that the Canadian Cancer Society does not contribute to your Provincial Health Care, its the supplier of the Cancer Treatment Products that offer charitable benefits to the patients and their treatment programs. 

Its the provinces that offer Clinical Trials and free enrollment.
Its the provinces that offer compassionate usage of ground breaking new products.
Its the provinces that pays for your stay and meals at a hospital.
Its the province that pays for all the treatments, blood supplements.
Its the province that pays for drugs coverage, unless you have employer benefits.

The provincial fund that coincidentally provides monies to bogus charities like CCS, an example, Trillium Foundation, reimburses manufacturers/suppliers for donating Cancer Treatment products/services.

A volunteer from the Cancer Society will give you a ride to and from the hospital, car pooling with others, but that&#039;s it.  Executives of CCS make $350,000 plus and they don&#039;t drive you anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>90 Million Dollars and they [Cancer Society] can&#8217;t even come up with a valid Scientific Paper that could be peer review by other Scientists and The Pest Management Regulatory Agency?</p>
<p>Show us the Growing Body of Evidence that lawn pesticides cause cancer.  There is none.</p>
<p>Show us evidence of provinces that have pesticide bans in place are now healthier than provinces that still use lawn pesticides.  There is none.</p>
<p>If you get Cancer you will notice very quickly that the Canadian Cancer Society does not contribute to your Provincial Health Care, its the supplier of the Cancer Treatment Products that offer charitable benefits to the patients and their treatment programs. </p>
<p>Its the provinces that offer Clinical Trials and free enrollment.<br />
Its the provinces that offer compassionate usage of ground breaking new products.<br />
Its the provinces that pays for your stay and meals at a hospital.<br />
Its the province that pays for all the treatments, blood supplements.<br />
Its the province that pays for drugs coverage, unless you have employer benefits.</p>
<p>The provincial fund that coincidentally provides monies to bogus charities like CCS, an example, Trillium Foundation, reimburses manufacturers/suppliers for donating Cancer Treatment products/services.</p>
<p>A volunteer from the Cancer Society will give you a ride to and from the hospital, car pooling with others, but that&#8217;s it.  Executives of CCS make $350,000 plus and they don&#8217;t drive you anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pesticide ban position questioned  by Dayton</title>
		<link>http://www.producer.com/2012/02/pesticide-ban-position-questioned%e2%80%a9/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Dayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.producer.com/?p=85810#comment-927</guid>
		<description>I can see a dilemma developing. Who says the customer is always right and we should cater to those consumers needs? That&#039;s plain foolish when academia  who are funded by the pesticide groups and large pesticide corps do their own peer reviewed studies to brainwash the farmers continually. Heck country music station&#039;s would go broke without these guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see a dilemma developing. Who says the customer is always right and we should cater to those consumers needs? That&#8217;s plain foolish when academia  who are funded by the pesticide groups and large pesticide corps do their own peer reviewed studies to brainwash the farmers continually. Heck country music station&#8217;s would go broke without these guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

