Grappling with GM animals

Federal report recommends greater regulatory transparency when evaluating GM livestock

The House of Commons agriculture committee has recommended greater regulatory transparency when evaluating genetically modified animals for human consumption.

However, it stopped short of recommending mandatory labelling of GM foods, saying the government should support that only for issues of food health and safety.

The NDP committee members filed a dissenting report on that point.

The report, tabled in the House in mid-December, follows public hearings in the fall after Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAulay requested the committee examine the legal and regulatory framework around GM animals.

Last spring, Health Canada approved AquaBounty salmon for both human and animal consumption, although it is not yet on the market. It was earlier approved in the United States and is also undergoing assessment in Argentina and Brazil.

GM crops have been around for decades, but the GM salmon is the first animal in the world for human consumption.

Research into a GM hog developed at the University of Guelph in 1999 stopped after Ontario Pork withdrew its support in 2012.

Related stories in this issue:

The Canadian Cattlemen’s Association told the committee that GM cattle won’t be on the market any time soon because the industry prefers classic selection.

ADVERTISMENT

The committee heard that the main reason more GM animals aren’t in development is consumer acceptance.

“Although producers in North America have largely embraced GM crops because of the economic and agronomic benefits they bring (in Canada alone improved crops have raised yields by 32 percent, according to CropLife), this is not the case in other countries, especially those of the European Union,” the report said.

“The testimony showed that the market still seems reluctant to accept transgenic animals.”

Other witnesses doubted the benefits of genetic modification in agriculture as a whole, suggesting they haven’t reduced pesticide use as claimed and have had little to no impact on reducing hunger because they aren’t grown in countries where hunger is an issue.

They also said there was no public consultation around the GM salmon. The Canadian Biotechnology Action Network asked the government to impose a moratorium on GM animal introduction until Canadians have their say.

“On the other hand, all the witnesses representing the biotechnology industry and the agriculture and agri-food sector are of the view that the market should be left to decide,” the report said.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency noted the country’s regulatory system focuses on safety and environmental protection, rather than making value judgments about why a product is created.

Witnesses said improving transparency of the regulatory system would boost public trust and provide better acceptance of products.

ADVERTISMENT

Suggestions included increasing independent research funding on the effects of GM products on health and the environment, and allowing Health Canada to do its own studies rather than rely on data from industry.

The committee heard from witnesses, including the CFIA, who said labelling is a complex issue.

While most consumers say GM foods should be labelled and that they don’t want to eat them, their buying behaviour suggests otherwise. Some witnesses suggested that mandatory labelling implies there are risks to GM foods.

“Given that no risks to health have been identified for GM foods approved in Canada, there are no particular labelling requirements,” the committee said in recommending mandatory labelling for health and safety only.

The NDP’s dissenting report said the opinions from witnesses on mandatory labelling were far from unanimous, and the committee recommendation doesn’t reflect that.

Instead, the NDP said the committee should have recommended that government, stakeholders and consumers work together to establish a GM labelling plan.

The committee also recommended the government support independent research into the health, environmental and other effects of new GM technologies, including those that would produce GM animals. Another recommendation called on the government and industry to establish tools for traceability for GM animals.

ADVERTISMENT

  • turtles have a say

    GM animals should not be allowed. Altering life so you can produce superior qualities that grow bigger, faster, meatier? resist disease etc. is creepy and wrong. What will be next? Altering human life for perfection? (I want a son vs a daughter so change her genes, I want my kid to be bigger than all the rest, change his genes, I want my kid to have blonde hair vs black, change their genes, the list is endless). We already allow GM crops which should stop. I don’t know how life got patented in the first place. Profits should never outweigh sanity. Corporations need to be side checked asap. these decisions are not for the greater good but are for a few select who want to get rich and control the world food supply. Look at Monsanto/Bayer. This is beyond dangerous and I wish Health Canada would live up to it’s name and start working for Canada on a whole, not corporate Canada.

    • Harold

      From us suited by nature to a nature suiting us. What can possibly go wrong when we think we know so much? If nature were to have asked our greatest scientific minds for advice while starting up, i wonder where we would be right now? Probably still waiting to move in? still working on the cow? Nature developed from the inside out, a realm still unknown, and science the opposite from the outside and in.
      From fish to cattle to humans, there is nothing that greed will not try to conquer.
      May i point out that Health Canada is a $Crown $Corporation as well, and like any corporation, it live’s up to the demands of the public only. I don’t hear a majority demand; do you? Then silence is truly “golden” and wishing is all that is earned. We need to learn why Canadians are constantly out-of-breath before we even start anything, and then fix it. and from there we can move forward with energy. Our own minds are our prisons. Eliminate wishing from one’s vocabulary is one baby step.