Winter bee losses decline, summer losses still mystery

Entomologist says summer deaths in hives could be virus and varroa mite related

Canadian beekeepers lost 16.8 percent of their colonies in the winter of 2015-16, which is one of the lowest rates of winter loss in recent history.

Meanwhile, American beekeepers lost 44 percent of their hives, based on a survey of U.S. apiarists.

The numbers suggest Canada’s beekeeping industry is in good shape while the Americans are struggling with a “beepocalypse,” but a U.S. bee expert says the story is more complicated.

The Canadian Association of Professional Apiculturists publishes a report on honeybee winter losses in July, compiled from a survey of beekeepers.

This year it showed that bee health and colony management is improving in Canada. Losses have dropped from more than 30 percent in the late 2000s to less than 20 percent the last couple of years.

The association said provincial apiculturists have been encouraging beekeepers to improve their hive management, such as monitoring honeybee pests like varroa mites.

Dennis van Engelsdorp, a University of Maryland entomologist, said winter losses have also declined in the United States.

Winter bee losses in the U.S. were 30 to 35 percent from 2006-10, based on survey data from the Bee Informed Partnership, a collaboration of bee research labs in the U.S.

The annual winter loss in the U.S. has dropped to 25 percent over the last five years, which is slightly higher than Canadian figures.

However, the Canadian survey only looks at winter losses, while the American survey tracks winter and summer losses of U.S. honeybee colonies.


“Certainly winter losses have decreased over our 10 years of monitoring, but it seems like our summer losses have increased,” said van Engelsdorp, who is the project director for the Bee Informed Partnership.

Colonies dying during the summer have propelled total U.S. losses to 40 percent and higher in three of the last four years.

A bar graph on the Bee Informed website clearly illustrates that more bee colonies are dying in the summer.

Van Engelsdorp said the cause of summer deaths remains a mystery.

“We don’t know…. It certainly could be virus and varroa (related),” said van Engelsdrop, a Canadian who studied at the University of Guelph.

“But it also suggests other things…. Not enough nutrition in the landscape… and pesticides are probably contributing to those summer losses.”

Varroa mites, an invasive species, have been present in American hives longer than they’ve been in Canada.

As a result, viruses carried by varroa mites have mutated into more dangerous forms in the U.S., which might partially explain the summer losses.

“The (varroa) viruses have been in the United States longer (and) Canada tends to be about 10 years behind in some of (these) emerging conditions,” van Engelsdorp said.


“We’ve seen the evolution of much more virulent strains of viruses…. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the really virulent strains of viruses, down here, aren’t yet up there (in Canada).”

Canada may not have the same bee pathogens, but beekeepers north of the border have noticed an unusual trend in the last few years.

Queen bees used to last two to three years before a beekeeper had to replace them. Now they’re not surviving as long, and beekeepers are asking why.

“I don’t know if you get a year and a half any more … so what’s going on? Why are the queens not lasting?” said Bryan Ash, a beekeeper from Gilbert Plains, Man.

Besides the lack of summertime loss data, Engelsdorp said the Canadian beekeeper survey might be skewed.

“It’s pretty clear that they (CAPA) are surveying mostly commercial beekeepers, and commercial beekeepers always lose fewer colonies,” he said.

“If you were to compare U.S. numbers and Canadian numbers … make sure that you’re comparing commercial beekeepers…. A lot of the losses that you’re seeing reported in the States are coming from the … backyard beekeepers.”

While it’s possible that Canadian bee colonies are doing better than America honeybees, van Engelsdorp said it’s unlikely related to better management.

“It’s interesting that the (loss) rates do seem lower,” he said.


“I think there are important insights there, but I don’t know whether it’s fair to say that Canadian beekeepers … are better than American beekeepers.”

  • Denise

    The systemic nature of neonicotinoids ,which resides for up to 6 years in the plant residues, soil and waterways, weaken the bees ability to fight off disease,weaken and disorient them. This is no mystery.

    • Harold

      don’t know – is the summary of any mystery and it seems that van Engalsdorp, University of Maryland entomologist and director of Bee Informed Partnership, has a mystery. Since his opinions are inconclusive, this article must be a lagging-in-progress-report. Not much that we can do with it.

  • Denise
  • Denise

    It’s certainly very concerning when we have to take our own canadian government to court, in this case PMRA, in order to get them do the right thing for this country.

  • Denise

    90% or more of the canola and corn seeds planted in North Americais are coated with neonicotinoids,. Why do farmers continue to blindly use these destructive seeds? The land is so overloaded with neonics it will take many, many years to restore a healthy balance to our ecosystem.
    Eighteen Years of Data Links Neonics to Bee Decline

    • RobertWager

      Sorry no the bees in Western Canada are doing just fine with canola that had seed treatments of neonics. Same for Australia. Getting information from activist sites is bound to lead you astray.

      • Denise

        Bees are not faring well ,anywhere in the world, where neonic- coated seeds are sown. This is what happens when the corporations are allowed to get so monsterous and dominate the sales of GE seeds and pesticides.
        Farmers have the power to stop this wholesale destruction of our environment but it will require finding untainted seed and changing some of their farming methods. Habits are hard to break.

      • Rob Bright

        Getting information from a well known pro-GMO, pro-agrochemical spokesperson … is even more likely to lead one astray. …

      • Harold

        Can you explain how your comment isn’t activism on your behalf? Can you explain, with the dictionary in hand, the negative connotation you place upon the word Activist? Will you explain from a mystery, how your comment holds standing amongst other activists, such as yourself, from those activists sites that you poorly refer to? Is it your believe that all science is limited to a select few you wish to choose? One last question; Was Agent Orange science, or anti-science, and who are, or who were, the Activists?
        “Getting information from activists sites is bound to lead you astray” is highly suggestive that you have the “yard stick of measure”in your possession. Led astray indeed.

  • Denise

    I know we are in a battle with Big AgChem. They don’t care as long as they can sell their products but we still need our bees and there is tipping point of no return when they push nature beyond its limits and arrogant mankind cannot restore what has been lost.