Niche growers hope CETA will resolve GM issues

Western Canadian farmland might not seem close to Europe, but for many farmers, European markets already seem right next door.

“We talk to Europeans pretty well every day,” said Paul Gregory, a honey and forage seed producer from Fisher Branch, Man.

“It’s an important market for us.”

The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the European Union will obviously affect the large Canadian export crops of wheat and canola.

However, the biggest direct impact might be felt by the smaller crops, which already serve niche markets in Europe.

Other stories in this Special Report:

CETA seems to protect the access that some of these crops have already gained. For others, the agreement seems to offer a way to build new markets with greater confidence.

However, it’s safe to say one formerly major export crop sector is greeting CETA with skepticism.

“I’m not sure how much difference it’s going to make,” said Eric Fridfinnson of Arborg, Man.

“I would hope (that increased export access occurs once CETA is finalized), but the experience we had …”


Fridfinnson is talking about what happened to Canadian flax in 2009 after trace amounts of an unapproved genetically modified variety appeared in shipments to Europe.

The EU closed its markets to Canada and now buys Canadian flax only for livestock feed, biodiesel and industrial uses.

Flax growers were hit hard, and many stopped growing the crop.

Fridfinnson suspects that European countries or special interest groups will continue to find ways to block trade, even if CETA creates more dependable access and systems to deal with disputes.

He fears that forage seed exports will suffer the same fate as flax now that GM forage varieties are being tested.

“Unless we can get the genie back into the bottle with Roundup Ready alfalfa, I think that business is at real risk,” said Fridfinnson, who grows forage seed for export.

Gregory also grows export forage seed, but he’s more optimistic about the potential for CETA to preserve and expand markets.

The zero tolerance policy for unapproved GM seeds now makes every shipment a gamble.

“Right now, we cannot get exporters insurance,” he said. “If this GM seed is found too late in the system, we could be looking at a multi-million dollar lawsuit against our farm and against our business. There’s risk for the grower, the shipper and the processor. It’s something that we hope is clarified.”


Gregory hopes that CETA’s dispute settlement and technical issues structure can defuse these potentially explosive situations before they cause the kind of damage that has darkened Fridfinnson’s view.

Gregory has seen Canadian honey shipments suffer because of the GM issue, and he hopes CETA can de-politicize the issue.

“If we were to ratify this agreement, it would help our exports for honey.”

Soybeans are another crop that could attract more attention in Europe as they spread west across the Prairies.

Ernie Sirski, who has started growing the crop on his farm near Dauphin, Man., doesn’t expect CETA to suddenly break open new markets because a lot of Canada’s soybean crop already goes to the EU.

“There will be some benefit for pulses and soybeans going into Europe, but it’s probably not going to affect us as much as other parts of agriculture,” Sirski said.

However, he said protecting current trade will be a significant gain because access can never be assumed to be permanent, as the flax situation proved.

As well, Canada might be edged out in the future if it doesn’t nail down access for its products.

“If we don’t have a trade agreement, then other countries will, and we have to make sure we’re at the same table and we’re not shut out of markets we’ve been traditionally in,” he said.


  • Zero tolerance for GMOs is a complete political absurdity.

    It’s time to stand up to the Europeans and tell them to read their own science on genetically-modified crops. They have no basis – scientific or legal – on which to force Canadian farmers to abandon new technologies. It’s a historically-unprecedented overreach… to say the least.

    Smarten up Europe! We grow GMOs here in North America. And if you don’t like it, maybe Cuba or some African nation will start supplying you with the massive shipments you require just to keep your populations fed.

    • Harold

      What will we “stand up” with- that isn’t already available to them? What will we “smarten up Europe” with- that isn’t already available to them? Would you say that the hub of all knowledge is contained within Canada, and the USA? Quite bold statements you make. In business, smarting up is- supplying the demand, or get out of the business; Its not dropping upon them, the Bomb of your Democracy. Could you provide us with a little of Monsanto’s “unprecedented” history, where we didn’t abandon his research and new technologies? Go back to the 1920’s. If you don’t think he approached government with “papers” in hand, then you’re sadly mistaken.

      • Bombing? What the heck are you talking about exactly?

    • Peter

      Why dont you broaden your horizons, and stop judging other regions with your north american values? Europeans have a different approach to agriculture, where they privilege what the consumer wants, and given the amount of tax payers money spent on agriculture over there, that seems legitimate. Europe is not starving, it has a much bigger agricultural power than Canada and it doesnt have the arrogant/stupid pretention to “feed the world”. Remember that enough food is already produced to feed everyone, the issue is the unequal distribution of it.
      Furthermore the problem here is not especially the GM, it’s about delivering the quality agreed upon, the example taken could have been MRL’s or even dockage limits. You have to deliver what you agreed upon with your customer/trading partner or you expose yourself to law suits as you breach a contract.
      How would you feel if when you signed to buy a mercedes, the dealer gives you a mazda instead? The mazda may be driving fine, but it’s not what you paid for…