VIDEO: Conservatives cost farmers billions: Goodale

A Liberal government in Ottawa would take immediate steps to improve grain transportation in Western Canada, starting with a full rail costing review to examine railway operating costs and revenues derived from moving prairie grain.

Ralph Goodale, a senior member of the federal Liberal party, accused the federal Conservatives of making a “colossal mess” of Western Canada’s grain handling and transportation system, adding that railway tie-ups, logistical inefficiencies, historically wide basis levels and Ottawa’s failure to devise a better system for moving prairie grain have cost the country’s farmers $5 billion over the past two or three years.

That figure does not include lost market opportunities that emerged after the elimination of single-desk grain marketing but were never fully developed due to poor logistical co-ordination and limited rail capacity, he added.

The Conservative government “made a huge, colossal mess,” said Goodale, who visited The Western Producer’s editorial offices May 20.

“That system and the way it failed is a direct product of the way that Gerry Ritz and Stephen Harper set it up, designed it … and implemented it.”

Goodale, a former federal agriculture minister, said Liberal efforts to clean up the government’s mess would begin with a railway costing review, which he said would sit well with most farm groups in Western Canada.

The last time Ottawa conducted a full costing review was in 1992.

ADVERTISMENT

He also suggested that railway revenue caps or maximum revenue entitlements would likely be retained by a Liberal government unless the costing review produced a “startlingly” unexpected result.

“Before you have any discussion about the revenue cap, you’ve got to have a costing review to get the facts,” he said.

“That would be a very useful exercise to examine what’s happened with the (rail) efficiencies over time, who’s gained, who’s lost and how is the revenue being shared within the system…?”

“After 22 years, it’s probably a good time to update that arithmetic.”

Goodale also suggested that a Justin Trudeau government would consider the creation of a new agency, with government oversight, to manage grain logistics and ensure that resources within the grain handling and transportation system are being used efficiently.

“You need some way of quarterbacking the system because it is so complicated and the value chain so far has not, by the magic hand of the market, produced some kind of adequate quarterbacking.”

“That function previously was performed by the wheat board, (but) it’s not there any more, so what is the alternative?”

ADVERTISMENT

Observers say the creation of such an organization is already one of the ideas being discussed as part of a Canada Transportation Act review process being led by former federal politician David Emerson.

A federally appointed CTA review panel is expected to report to government with its recommendations before the end of the year.

Goodale said a Liberal government would define what constitutes adequate service to rail shippers, develop clear ways to measure railway performance and implement a system that ensures adequate service at a reasonable cost.

He did not rule out the use of legislation or regulations that include monetary penalties against railways in the event that they fail to meet their contractual obligations to shippers.

“A legislative result is not necessarily the best one but if that’s the only way you can get accountability into the system, then that is a recourse that you have to have available,” Goodale said.

Contact brian.cross@producer.com

ADVERTISMENT

  • Ddant

    That’s strange. In the 90’s the Liberals only cared if you were supply management. The grain industry was struggling and their solution was to grass down the prairies.

    • ed

      Actually that is not true. All the margin based APF’s were helping the grain farmers to the tune of billions of dollars annually. The Liberals had the subsidy for farmers solidly up against the $6 billion annual cap allowed under the Free Trade and NAFTA agreements. This stabilized grain farming the most, livestock somewhat and supply management was of coarse virtually the only larger ag. sector that could break even or better most of the time. The Conservatives promptly rolled that back to under $2 billion annually and aggregate farm debt started to skyrocket again. They, the Conservatives did this for a few reasons. One, they are terrible at handling the federal taxation revenues and have no money to invest in things that make sense and, Two, they did not want the tax payers back filling the financial burden (approx. 3-4 $billion annually) caused by the annexation of the CWB single desk selling monopoly of the Western Canadian farmers. A few changes to structure change, reference margins and trigger mechanisms fixed that. Farmers are basically on their own under this regime and the price farmers will ultimately pay will be staggering. Stay tuned!!

  • ed

    You are correct about Vancleif. He was by no means Canada’s best Ag. Minister. Andy Mitchell was much better, Bob Speller had great promise as well, but Mr. Ritz is atrocious. There is always room for improvement, but some times you need to scrap everything and start over and that is where we are at with Mr. Ritz. He is more like the Minister responsible for dismantling Canadian agriculture. He is very good at that and there are very complaints from the coporates the power balance gains for them. Ralph Goodale is very adept on Prairie Agriculture but seasoned on all other fronts as well so with Ag. wrongfully getting a back seat all the time, other priorities will not likely put him there. We will likely get someone new which is common for this portfolio. It is said to be one of the toughest positions and should not be filled by a rookie. As always that puts farmers behind the eight ball in regards to sound policy development.

  • Roger Foster

    The Liberal Party of Canada has no interest in making farmers successful.

    They would like to put in a carbon reducing strategy nationally:

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-vows-to-set-national-carbon-reduction-targets-1.2948272

    This can only happen by pricing carbon… in a day and age when China is building a coal plant a week.

    Goodale has his own baggage, but the Liberal Party of Canada doesn’t care about you, and is amazingly incompetent. After all, according to Trudeau… “The budget will balance itself”.