Sierra Club joins chorus calling to ban neonicotinoid use

Movement gains momentum Environmental group and Ontario and Quebec beekeepers’ associations are concerned about link to bee deaths

Beekeepers are walking a fine line if they campaign against pesticides alongside environmental groups because beekeepers also use pesticides, says Rod Scarlett, executive director of the Canadian Honey Council.


“I think everybody has to bear in mind that beekeepers, themselves, use pesticides,” he said. 


“It’s not like we don’t use products.”


The Sierra Club of Canada issued a statement in late November that called on the federal government to ban a class of pesticides known as neonicotinoids, which are widely used as seed treatments on corn, soybeans and canola.


The Sierra Club said a recent Italian study shows that clothianidin, a Bayer neonicotinoid, damages bees’ immune systems and destroys their ability to fight disease.


“It is important new evidence that helps explain the devastating impact these pesticides have had on bee populations,” said John Bennett, Sierra Club’s national campaign director.


The Italian study is the latest to say that neonicotinoids are detrimental to bee health. Earlier this year, the European Commission suspended the use of neonicotinoids for two years.


Bennett said the Sierra Club of Canada is part of a loose coalition working to ban neonics, which in-cludes the David Suzuki Foundation, the National Farmers Union, the United Church of Canada, the Canadian Environmental Law Association and Canadian Organic Growers.


Beekeepers associations in Quebec and Ontario have also campaigned for a ban following widespread bee deaths at bee yards over the last two years, particularly in Ontario.


Bennett said the Sierra Club has had conversations with the Ontario Beekeepers’ Association regarding the ban, but there is no formal relationship.


Dan Davidson, president of the Ontario Beekeepers’ Association, said his association isn’t working with environmental non-governmental organizations to ban neonics.


“It’s not like we’re joining forces or aligning with environmental groups,” he said. 


“I don’t think we need to ban all pesticides, that’s not what the Ontario beekeepers stand for. It would be quite hypocritical considering we put pesticides in our hives to control varroa mites.” 


Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency announced in September that current agricultural practices, where neonics are applied to corn and soybean seeds, are not sustainable because tests on dead bees show that insecticide laden dust from planters are killing bees.


Other provincial beekeeping associations are taking a wait and see approach on neonicotinoids because many entomologists, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and other scientific bodies maintain that neonics may play a role in bee losses but are not the primary factor.


Bryan Ash, the Manitoba Beekeepers’ Association’s representative to the Canadian Honey Council, said it’s concerning that the Sierra Club is “dabbling” in this issue.


The Sierra Club campaigns against pesticides in general, including an insecticide that beekeepers use to control mites called amitraz, Ash said.


“The Sierra group, they publish a long list of insecticides and pesticides that they want to see banned and amitraz is on that list.”


Bennett didn’t comment on the Sierra Club’s stance on amitraz. Nonetheless, he said the group does “have concerns about a lot of pesticides.”


Scarlett said the issue is a conundrum for beekeepers because they use insecticides, just like farmers who grow crops. 


“The products we use are made by the same companies,” he said.

5 Responses

Post a response
  1. Sorry Rod Scarlett, but using chemicals to treat ones bees has nothing to do with planting millions of acres of poison plants contaminating pollen nectar and ground water, and poisoning everyone’s bees including wild hives and other none target organisms.

  2. Neo Nick on

    Please note that the Canadian Honey Council is sponsored by Bayer Cropscience…the inventor of neonicotinoids…

    http://www.honeycouncil.ca/sponsorship.php

  3. Too bee clear on

    Beekeepers are NOT attacking the use of ALL pesticides, only ONE CLASS which is, as used, causing excessive collateral damage, DEATH.
    There is no tight rope, or conflicting interest in pressing for removal of Registration of a pesticide which when after put into use was determined to have unacceptable unintended consquence… in this case killing beneficial pollinating insects, honeybees.
    Further there is nothing unusual about Environmental groups taking a similar stance to protect everything else in the enviroment which is being killed.

  4. I am astonished at the comments of the Honey Council representatives! First, many beekeepers are going treatment free or are avoiding “hard” pesticides in their hives and using Integrated Pest Management techniques. Second, even the hard treatments involve minute quantities of the pesticides, contained in the hive. They are not spread all over hundreds and hundreds of acres, onto food crops. There is no question that we must, must stop applying agrichemicals that end up killing or lethally weakening honeybees and polllinators, and which aren’t great for the rest of us either. We need to help farmers find healthy alternatives.But suggesting that miticide use by some beekeepers (usually the big commercial honey and pollination operators) makes them complicit in pesticide use in the wider sense is specious reasoning and ingenuous at best. When the bee industry crashes thanks to their doublespeak, I guess the Honey Council boys will all be entering politics, seeking Senate seats??

Respond





You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>